w88 slot

(Source:"China Education News" March 22, 2021 第Version 5）

Xia Wenbin

Constructing a systematic, scientific and complete evaluation system is an important prerequisite for promoting the high-quality development of higher education. Evaluation requires comparison, and there needs to be a system and mechanism to reward the superior and punish the inferior supported by a scientific indicator system.The "Five Onlys" (only scores, only further education, only diplomas, only essays, only hats) are imminent. At the same time, it is urgent to establish new evaluation standards as soon as possible.

First, eliminate simplification and establish a diversified education evaluation system.w88 casino games loginThe so-called simplification refers to using one or two solidified rulers as the standard. This will inevitably lead to the failure to fully reflect the value of talents or achievements, and it is also difficult to determine a competitive ranking. For example, for some time, we have used scores as the yardstick to evaluate students. Whoever scores higher will be awarded honors such as postgraduate guarantee and outstanding student without hesitation. This single evaluation seems fair and easy to operate, but it obliterates the role of talent cultivation.

We must take a clear-cut stand to get rid of the above-mentioned incorrect evaluation orientation, get to the bottom of things, and establish an evaluation system that conforms to the laws of talent growth. In this process, of course we have toThe word "broken" comes first, but this "broken" must be understood dialectically. Destruction is not a complete denial, but a kind of sublation.

The second is to eliminate hierarchy and establish a performance-oriented education evaluation system.For a long time, hierarchical evaluation has beenAn important manifestation of the "Five Wei". This evaluation orientation is confusing. For example, the reward orientation depends on the level at which the article is published, whether the award is national or provincial, which university the graduates come from, etc.

For the evaluation of talents and professional titles, high-level journals and other results certainly have important reference evaluation value, but they are not the only ones, and they cannot deprive other schools and journals of their w88 mobileright to compete. The reference for putting talents and achievements with different backgrounds on the same starting line is performance, which is to see whether these talents and achievements have solved major scientific frontiers and basic problems, whether they have solved pressing national economic and social problems, and whether they have raised

The third is to eliminate instrumentalization and establish an educational evaluation system that embodies the humanistic spirit.There are two problems with instrumental evaluation: First, living people are regarded as tools, and the trained talents are regarded as tools and machines produced in factories. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a replicable and standardized evaluation index. This kind of evaluation seems scientific and precise, but it turns a dynamic and rich organic life into a“Zombie”, such an evaluation will definitely stifle people’s creativity. The second is to deny the diversity of individual life.

Education requires humanistic feelings, because education means“One tree shakes another, one cloud pushes another, one soul awakens another.” When Qian Zhongshu applied for the Department of Foreign Languages ​​and Literature at Tsinghua University, he only scored 15 points in mathematics. However, he had a very strong foundation in literature and foreign languages. Luo Jialun, the president of Tsinghua University at the time, defied all odds and accepted him. He later became a famous writer and thinker.

(The author is the president of University of International Business and Economics)

Attached original text link:

https://www.sohu.com/a/456671131_243614